<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: apt-get or aptitude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technopotomus.com/2009/05/apt-get-or-aptitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technopotomus.com/2009/05/apt-get-or-aptitude/</link>
	<description>Home Network Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.Y. Siu</title>
		<link>http://technopotomus.com/2009/05/apt-get-or-aptitude/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Y. Siu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technopotomus.com/?p=192#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I used to think &lt;i&gt;aptitude&lt;/i&gt; handled dependencies better... until &lt;i&gt;apt-get&lt;/i&gt; got the &lt;i&gt;autoremove&lt;/i&gt; feature (which also appears in Synaptic now) and until I saw a lot of Ubuntu Forums users getting situations in which &lt;i&gt;aptitude&lt;/i&gt; was a bit too aggressive and wanted to uninstall everything.

Now I always recommend &lt;i&gt;apt-get&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think <i>aptitude</i> handled dependencies better&#8230; until <i>apt-get</i> got the <i>autoremove</i> feature (which also appears in Synaptic now) and until I saw a lot of Ubuntu Forums users getting situations in which <i>aptitude</i> was a bit too aggressive and wanted to uninstall everything.</p>
<p>Now I always recommend <i>apt-get</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
